A blog from The New York Times that tracks the health care debate as it unfolds.
Tuesday, November 24, 2009
Private Equity Again
Wednesday, November 18, 2009
Jobs and Health Care
Monday, November 16, 2009
Drug Prices Going Up
Thursday, November 12, 2009
Glen Beck on Healthcare and more
Bachmann on Health Care
The Decade in 7 Minutes
Wednesday, November 11, 2009
Response to Walmart sick-leave articles:
This is a tough one.
Article from Reuters found here.
An Interesting Idea...
http://www.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idUSTRE5AA4YV20091111.
Tuesday, November 10, 2009
"WHAT WORKS"?
(NaturalNews) When it comes to affordable, effective health care reform in America, there's only one question that really needs to be asked right now: What works?
In other words, what works to keep people healthy? What's affordable, safe and supports the long-term health of the population? What's available right now that can help people get healthy and remain healthy?
Those answers aren't difficult. They're found, in fact, in the fresh produce section of every grocery store in America, and even more answers are found in the dietary supplementsections of health food stores. In America today, we don't have a lack of good answers to the current health carecrisis; what we have is too many people asking the wrong questions!
Instead of asking, "What works?" we have health care reform lobbyists and pharmaceutical pushers putting their efforts into a completely different question: "What's profitable?"
The entire health care reform conversation taking place today is based around that question: What's profitable? How can we make the most money by requiring the most people to participate in our profit-making system? That's the real reason behind mandatory health insurance requirements, by the way.
But what if we threw out everything we think we know about health care right now and started from scratch? Toss out the current complex system of failed treatments, failed insurance plans and the monopolistic practices that dominate western today. What if we started with a blank slate?
If we started over, wouldn't the first and most important question simply be "What works?"
A universe of possibilities to consider
Answering that question necessarily involves consideringall the possibilities of what works. We've got to look at what works in the known universe, not just what works in one system of medicine. Proponents of western medicine, as you well know, want to limit the entire discussion of health care reform to their own narrowly-defined systems of chemical intervention, ineffective disease screening, medically unjustified surgeries and deadly chemotherapy treatments. But that's not an honest answer to the "what works" question... it's only a predetermined, narrow interpretation of the question that ultimately lends little value toward finding real health care solutions.In answering the "what works?" question, we've got to consider healing foods, nutritional supplements, exercise, stress reduction, vibrational medicine, Traditional Chinese Medicine, spiritual medicine, healing through intention, body work, chiropractic care, mind-body medicine, the healing arts and much more. Not surprisingly, once you open up the possibility of answers to include the entire universe of possibilities, you quickly begin to discover safe, affordable and highly effective healing modalities that can help people prevent and eliminate disease while enhancing lifelong health and happiness.
For example, simple dietary changes alone can eliminate 70% of cancers all by themselves. Combined with superfoodnutrition (which is ridiculously affordable compared to urgent medical care), sunshine, exercise and stress reduction, we can prevent 90% of all cancers using what we know right now -- without a single visit to a hospital or a clinic. (And without a single additional dollar being spent to "find a cure.") '
Monday, November 9, 2009
Cole on Health Care II
I watched the news a couple nights ago and found this topic about Wal-Mart and it's employees.
There is a video on the subject. It doesn't talk about health insurance but about sick days and
losing money for missing work. I though it was an interesting video. Here it is.
http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/OnCall/walmart-defends-sick-leave-policy-good-morning-america/story?id=9013693
New Health care proposal would limit options
Polling Website
Last Minute Anti Abortion Clause
Downn then Upss
Medical Industry Grumbles, but It Stands to Gain
For any industry, there has to be at least some good news any time Congress votes to expand the market by tens of millions of customers.
Health Care Conversations
Share your thoughts about the health care debate.
Top Discussions: The Public Option| Medicare and the Elderly | A Single-Payer System
Multimedia
Related
Prescriptions: If Anything, the Senate's Task Is Trickier
Obama Presses Senate to Pass Its Health Bill (November 9, 2009)
For Abortion Foes, a Victory in Health Care Vote (November 9, 2009)
Louisiana Republican Breaks Ranks on Health Bill (November 9, 2009)
But the business world found plenty to complain about Sunday, as it assessed the House bill that would make sweeping changes in the health care system and extend insurance coverage to millions more Americans.
Insurers do not like the provision to create a new government-run insurance program. Drug makers oppose billions of dollars in rebates they would have to give to the government over 10 years. Makers of artificial hips, heart defibrillators and other medical devices are not particularly happy about the proposed 2.5 percent tax on their products.
And employers large and small oppose rules that, for many of them, would make health care coverage — long a job benefit — become a federally mandated obligation.
That is why, as attention now shifts to the Senate, where Democratic leaders are trying to merge two bills into one, virtually every business group with a stake in the outcome will be hoping to strike at least a slightly better deal than they found in the House version.
And they may indeed get a break from the Senate, where the need for Democrats to compromise to win 60 votes may ensure a more business-moderate outcome.
And yet, many analysts said on Sunday that even the House bill was not as bad for business as many in the health care industry might have feared when the overhaul effort began many months ago.
“All industries stand to gain from this legislation,” Steven D. Findlay, senior health policy analyst with Consumers Unionin Washington, said in an interview. “They’re going to continue to fight their narrow issues and get the best that they can get. But all of them are aware they stand to gain significant new business and new revenue streams as more Americans get health coverage and money flows into the system for them.”
Of course, new revenue streams apply only to companies in the business of selling medical goods and services. To employers required to provide worker health benefits or else, in many cases, pay some sort of financial penalty, the House legislation offers little to cheer about.
Employer groups complained on Sunday that the House bill would impose insurance obligations while doing little to rein in the medical costs that help drive premiums higher year after year. In fact, those groups argue, the bill’s creation of a government-run insurance program, which may pay doctors and hospitals less than private insurers do, could end up shifting even more medical costs to the private insurance system that employers use.
“This won’t just hurt business, it will hurt millions of workers who have coverage through their employers,” said John J. Castellani, president the Business Roundtable, a group of chief executives of some of the nation’s biggest companies.
And the National Federation of Independent Business, representing many small businesses, said it was furious with the legislation. Susan Eckerly, senior vice president of the federation, attacked mandates, which she called punitive, and “atrocious new taxes.” The legislation, she said, was “a failed opportunity to help small-business owners with their No. 1 problem — skyrocketing health care costs.”
Another group, the Small Business Majority, praised the legislation but said the Senate needed to take more steps to lower costs.
Employers hope the final Senate legislation ends up looking more like the bill the Finance Committee passed, which does not require companies to insure their workers.
Meanwhile, the health insurance industry has been increasingly vocal about the emerging shape of the legislation, and it was sharply critical of the bill that passed on Saturday night.
“The current House legislation fails to bend the health cost curve and breaks the promise that those who like their current coverage can keep it,” Karen M. Ignagni, the chief executive of America’s Health Insurance Plans, the industry trade association, said.
The reference to a broken promise refers, in part, to people enrolled in privately offeredMedicare Advantage insurance plans, which would lose federal subsidies under the House bill. Ms. Ignagni warned of cuts that would “force millions of seniors out of the program entirely.”
But the promise reference also refers to the bill’s provision of a new government-run insurance plan that would compete directly with the health plans offered by private insurers. The insurance industry has long opposed such a move and warns that it will eventually force many people with private insurance into the government-run program.
That “public option,” as it is known, was also in the Senate health committee bill approved in July. And the Senate majority leader, Harry Reid, Democrat of Nevada, has also signaled that he intends to include some kind of public plan in whatever Senate legislation is reached.
comment: this article is interesting because it talks about the tax and how the government wants to raise it to 2.5 percent, which would affect medicare and medicaid. it would make it so much more difficult for people and insurance companies who need or have patients who need a fake arm or leg to be able to afford it. however, they are raising the tax to help the whole nation so this could be looked at as a sacrifice if the money is put to correct use.
++ NEW YORK TIMES++: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/09/health/policy/09industry.html?ref=health
Sunday, November 8, 2009
why are health costs rising?
Free Market Survey
Health Care Reform Vote Update
News Ways of Seeing
Friday, November 6, 2009
Health Care Reform continued
Thursday, November 5, 2009
Healthcare Issues
Roses Articles
Samantha - Abortion in Health Care Reform
this is interesting because it covers abortion and how a new plan would have to involve a pro-life and pro-choice option.
Health Care Homework 11/5
1. Time Obama Speech
2. CBSMoneyWatch.com
2. New Scientist
3. MoveOn.org
Health care issues
Wednesday, November 4, 2009
5 Things you Will Lose With Health Reform
Most Americans oppose health care reforms
Tuesday, November 3, 2009
Health Care Not Covering Abuse Victims
White House Website
Health Care Reform
Health Bill Worse Than "Terrorist"
Health Care
Monday, November 2, 2009
Healthcare Videos
Some people have made reply videos trying to prove that we DON'T need a government run option. For instance, this one.
You definitely have to fact check when you look at things on youtube, but I think its really cool that there are ways like this for the population to express their opinions.
Cole on Health Care
I did go to the help desk today and got into the system. At the time I thought everything was fine but now i realize I still can't start a new topic.
I can only comment on other posts. I found this good site for health care between different states. If you could post it for me that will be great.
I will go back to the help desk tomorrow and finally get it fixed all together. The site is http://www.healthreform.gov/
Thank you.
Cole
Health Care Reform Part 1
Tuesday, October 20, 2009
Wednesday, October 14, 2009
Fashion Industry In The Recessoin
Sunday, October 11, 2009
East Hampton Star
More on Private Equity
Wednesday, October 7, 2009
Goldman Sachs NY Times
Monday, October 5, 2009
Homework 10/5 Flipped!
Goldman Sachs
Sunday, October 4, 2009
Shifting power in currency
Recession in the Fashion World
Friday, October 2, 2009
Sad but True
Fashion In The Recession
Defense Earmarks
micro-finance, how the economic crisis is affecting...
How is the financial crisis impacting microfinance institutions (MFIs) and their clients? What can the microfinance industry do? These were the questions addressed at the virtual conference hosted by CGAP between Nov 18-20. There were 600 MFI managers, central bankers, investors, and advisers from 34 countries and the150 entries submitted by these participants provided a vivid and powerful picture of what is going on. According to the summary sent out by Elizabeth Littlefield, Director and CEO of CGAP,
"The dominos of the crisis-credit crunch, inflation, currency dislocations and global recession- are hitting microfinance in very different ways, depending on location, funding structure, financial state and the economic health of their clients. While many places seem unaffected today, there is little doubt that there will be impact: integration of microfinance into the mainstream does have costs."
Other salient points from the summary report were;
-deposit taking MFIs are well-insulated from the crisis
-immediate concern is how the global liquidity contraction will affect the cost & availabilty of funding to non-deposit taking MFIs
-institutional investors in microfinance are not seeing significant redemptions but they do expect fundraising to become more difficult in the coming months
-advice to MFIs included: increase reserves, cut back on growth and focus on portfolio quality, make sure loan officers are informed and attentive to client needs and communicate early and often with lenders and investors
-concerns about overreaction by policymakers
-amid the anxiety some optimism...as some markets had become overheated so slower growth, tighter credit more conservative policies, better products and even consolidation of weaker institutions may be beneficial in the long run
I logged in during the 3 day conference and one positive impression was how the industry of microfinance (the players) continue to be willing and passionate to share and give information for the improvement of the whole industry, an attitude that the mainstream should learn from microfinance.
notes:
- this is interesting because it explains how the recession can affect micro-finance. for example, it could be based of the location, the formula that a micro-finance company fines their investments, and also has to do with the health of their clients. it also explains how the recession will make funding more and more difficult for the people in need. advice is also given in this articles. some examples are for micro -finance companies to cut back on growth.
website: http://www.microfinance.ws/weblog/2008/12/impact_of_financial_crisis_on.html
Thursday, October 1, 2009
Community Colleges
Forks WA - Twilight, and Real Life.
(The full article can be found here, if anyone wants to read it.)
Emily Watson (Entertainment in the Recession)
“Is a College Education Worth the Debt?”
Reminder
Sports in The Recession
Homework 10/1 More Free Market
Banks
Wednesday, September 30, 2009
The Recession and the Military
Defense Spending
Tuesday, September 29, 2009
how the economic crisis affects global micro-finance.
Microfinance and the financial crisis
Editor's Note: Elizabeth Littlefield is Director and CEO of CGAP. From November 18-20, CGAP is running a virtual conference on microfinance and the financial crisis.
Throughout past financial crises—especially those of the 1990s (Mexico, Asia, Russia)—financial services for poor people have shown remarkable resilience to shock. In fact, the loan portfolios of microfinance institutions (MFIs) in Asia during the Asian crisis and in Latin America during various banking crises in that region barely blinked while corporate portfolios collapsed.
This is because these banking and currency crises had little relevance to subsistence-based economies in closed ecosystem markets. Our present financial crisis is like no other, and microfinance is far more connected now. Although microfinance still has deep shock-resistant roots, there will be impact—both on the institutions and the clients they serve. The medium and longer term effects of a global recession are likely to be punishing to poor people.
Low-income people in many places already have been suffering from high food and fuel prices. A recent CGAP survey of MFIs revealed that many clients were withdrawing savings, cutting back on nonfood expenses and in some cases struggling with repayment. While prices have come down in recent months, inflation is poised to surge. Making matters worse, remittances from the United States and Europe are down sharply. Mexican remittances from the United States are slowing significantly, and now the same is happening in Europe, Africa corridors, and elsewhere. So, in many places—though not everywhere—clients are feeling serious pressures.
MFIs will likely feel the first effects of the financial market turmoil in sharply curtailed funding. From domestic and international lenders, investors and depositors, money will become more scarce, more conservative, and more costly. Refinancing risk is a serious concern for some institutions.
Many MFIs depend on financing from local and international banks. They face more pressure today than MFIs that have built a deposit base. Some are already seeing their banks withdrawing loan offers, cutting credit lines, or raising rates. Some banks are even asking for loan prepayment and offering to waive prepayment fees. Steep rate increases are being announced—from 250 basis points in Eastern Europe, to 450 basis points for top-tier institutions in South Asia. While the immediate reactions have come from international banks, domestic ones may well pull back too.
A stronger U.S. dollar and steep local currency depreciation in developing countries means the cost of dollar financing for MFIs has increased dramatically. While the dollar may well soften, unhedged principal and interest payments in dollars will be difficult for MFIs to fund in the interim.
A few private equity transactions have closed even in the past few weeks, but these have been in the very deep and heated Indian market. For the most part, we are sensing that most private deals are slowed up and the few planned IPOs are on hold.
Financial pressures on families may lead to less savings and more withdrawals from deposit-taking MFIs. Also, some clients may understandably worry about the safety of their life savings and decide the mattress is safer. In previous banking crises depository MFIs fared well, but we worry that this one is different. Thus far, we have seen only a few isolated deposit runs, and these seem to have been triggered by a combination of factors beyond the crisis. But we worry about how rumors could shake confidence even amongst microfinance clients in today’s globally connected and wired world.
NOTES: this article is really interesting because it explains the damage being done to businesses which are trying to help and save people all over the world. This economic downfall is lowering MFI's income becuase banks and partners can no longer loan money that a micro finance firm would distribute to get poor people a chance at living; usually, third world countries.
The Recessions effect on Religion
Sunday, September 27, 2009
Impact on the Entertainment Buisness
Friday, September 25, 2009
Women in the Recession
This article is very interesting because it is saying that women are re-considering having children until later, or not at all. This could be the opposite of a baby boomer. I wonder what will happen.
Thursday, September 24, 2009
Banks too big?
Wednesday, September 23, 2009
Unemployment Article
Homework 9/23 The Free Market (Con't)
You also need to decide on a particle aspect of the current financial recession that you would like to investigate further. This topic should be something that you are particularly interested in researching. You will become our "resident expert" on this topic and will use your research to keep the rest of the class aware of current events happening in your subject. Possible topics include:
the credit crunch
government financial institutions (e.g. the Treasury Dept, SEC, Federal Reserve System)
international financial institutions (the World Bank, IMF)
Wall Street practices
Wall Street firms
Banking Crisis
government response (TARP, bailouts)
impact on Main Street
Unemployment
impact on various professions (retail, housing/construction, sports/entertainment, advertising, etc.)
economic theory (free market, regulation, planned economies)
Remember that I will not be in class on Friday and we have a holiday on Monday. By Tuesday you need to have chosen a topic and begun your research. You are required to have at least one blog post on your topic by Thursday 10/1. Please email me as soon as you have your topic.
P.S. I'm sorry that this is so late in the evening. I'm afraid some of you may not see this before class Thursday. Please, as always, do what you can. And some of you have not yet posted articles and/or the required number of comment. Now would be a good time to do so. This is part of your grade.
Tuesday, September 22, 2009
British Parliament
My articles
Monday, September 21, 2009
This Made me Laugh SO Hard...
Videos Today
Homework 9/21 The Free Market
Jocelyn Cole HW
http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/subjects/u/united_states_economy/index.html
It is about the overall US economy. It gives a good understanding of the economy and what is happening and what happened.
Here is my second article:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mike-laracy/new-poll-shows-americans_b_291317.html
This article is more about what is happening to Americans and how they are being affected from the recession. It also talks about the governments involvement in the economy and what the people want and expect of the government.
Cholena Smith Recession Articles
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/16/business/economy/16bernanke.html?_r=1&scp=1&sq=FEd%20Chief%20Says%20REcession%20Is%20%22Very%20likely%20Over%22&st=cse
website. http://www.nydailynews.com/money/investing/2009/09/15/2009-09-15_bam_speaks_street_shrugs.html
notes: This article is interesting because it shows wall streets lack of participation in trying to regulate health care prices. Also how people on Wall Street believe they can stop a consumer America but that’s because they want the support of banks. Wall street seems to only be looking at the money not the people.
U.S. to Hit Debt Ceiling- Again
Published 09/17/09 Dustin Ensinger - Print ArticleE-mail - editor@economyincisis.org
Sometime after the battle over health care reform is over, for the 90th time in the past 69 years lawmakers are set to engage in another contentious debate, this one with a foregone conclusion.
This fall, lawmakers will once again increase the national debt ceiling. The debate will be highly partisan, but the outcome will assuredly be that the U.S will raise its credit limit by about $1 trillion.
At $12.1 trillion, the national debt ceiling was just $349 billion away from being topped after unprecedented intervention into the financial markets that included $700 billion in bailouts and a $787 billion stimulus package.
On August 7, the U.S. Treasury Department sent a letter to lawmakers warning them that another vote to raise the national debt ceiling was imminent. Since that time, the economy has improved somewhat. Lawmakers are hoping that this will allow them to put the vote off until later in the year and provide them with some political cover.
"We're getting some signals that the economy is perking up a little bit so that we don't have to face (debt limit legislation) until maybe November," Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus(D-MT) said, according to the ,Associated Press.
Still, the vote is certain to be one fuel of political bomb-throwing. As is typically the case, the party out of power will almost uniformly oppose any debt increase, calling it an undue burden placed on future generations.
Even so, lawmakers have little choice but to go ahead with the debt increase. Without it, the U.S. Treasury Department would be unable to pay the holders of securities when they came due, meaning that the U.S. would essentially default on its debt obligations.
If that were to happen, it would send shockwaves through the world’s economies .
"Our credit as a nation would plummet immediately and throw the world economy into a depression," Charles Konigsberg, chief budget counsel for The Concord Coalition, a deficit watchdog group, toldCNNMoney.com.
The debate and ensuing vote could, however, have major implications for President Barack Obama’s domestic agenda that includes a nearly $1 trillion health care reform package, cap-and-trade legislation and other forms of expanded federal spending. In addition, the current White House budget projections estimate a budget deficit of $9 trillion over the next decade.
“Passing a trillion-dollar health-care bill on top of a trillion dollar deficit won’t convince Americans that Congress is serious about reining in spending, and it won’t put our fiscal house in order,” Senate Minority Whip John Kyl wrote in theNational Ledger.
notes: this is interesting because it talks about raising the national debt and how that would be the only way to help the market. and the health care base been reformed over 80 times in less than 70 years. and without this raise of national debt america would not be able to measure up to its "debt obligations".