A blog from The New York Times that tracks the health care debate as it unfolds.
Tuesday, November 24, 2009
Private Equity Again
Wednesday, November 18, 2009
Jobs and Health Care
Monday, November 16, 2009
Drug Prices Going Up
Thursday, November 12, 2009
Glen Beck on Healthcare and more
Bachmann on Health Care
The Decade in 7 Minutes
Wednesday, November 11, 2009
Response to Walmart sick-leave articles:
This is a tough one.
Article from Reuters found here.
An Interesting Idea...
http://www.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idUSTRE5AA4YV20091111.
Tuesday, November 10, 2009
"WHAT WORKS"?
(NaturalNews) When it comes to affordable, effective health care reform in America, there's only one question that really needs to be asked right now: What works?
In other words, what works to keep people healthy? What's affordable, safe and supports the long-term health of the population? What's available right now that can help people get healthy and remain healthy?
Those answers aren't difficult. They're found, in fact, in the fresh produce section of every grocery store in America, and even more answers are found in the dietary supplementsections of health food stores. In America today, we don't have a lack of good answers to the current health carecrisis; what we have is too many people asking the wrong questions!
Instead of asking, "What works?" we have health care reform lobbyists and pharmaceutical pushers putting their efforts into a completely different question: "What's profitable?"
The entire health care reform conversation taking place today is based around that question: What's profitable? How can we make the most money by requiring the most people to participate in our profit-making system? That's the real reason behind mandatory health insurance requirements, by the way.
But what if we threw out everything we think we know about health care right now and started from scratch? Toss out the current complex system of failed treatments, failed insurance plans and the monopolistic practices that dominate western today. What if we started with a blank slate?
If we started over, wouldn't the first and most important question simply be "What works?"
A universe of possibilities to consider
Answering that question necessarily involves consideringall the possibilities of what works. We've got to look at what works in the known universe, not just what works in one system of medicine. Proponents of western medicine, as you well know, want to limit the entire discussion of health care reform to their own narrowly-defined systems of chemical intervention, ineffective disease screening, medically unjustified surgeries and deadly chemotherapy treatments. But that's not an honest answer to the "what works" question... it's only a predetermined, narrow interpretation of the question that ultimately lends little value toward finding real health care solutions.In answering the "what works?" question, we've got to consider healing foods, nutritional supplements, exercise, stress reduction, vibrational medicine, Traditional Chinese Medicine, spiritual medicine, healing through intention, body work, chiropractic care, mind-body medicine, the healing arts and much more. Not surprisingly, once you open up the possibility of answers to include the entire universe of possibilities, you quickly begin to discover safe, affordable and highly effective healing modalities that can help people prevent and eliminate disease while enhancing lifelong health and happiness.
For example, simple dietary changes alone can eliminate 70% of cancers all by themselves. Combined with superfoodnutrition (which is ridiculously affordable compared to urgent medical care), sunshine, exercise and stress reduction, we can prevent 90% of all cancers using what we know right now -- without a single visit to a hospital or a clinic. (And without a single additional dollar being spent to "find a cure.") '
Monday, November 9, 2009
Cole on Health Care II
I watched the news a couple nights ago and found this topic about Wal-Mart and it's employees.
There is a video on the subject. It doesn't talk about health insurance but about sick days and
losing money for missing work. I though it was an interesting video. Here it is.
http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/OnCall/walmart-defends-sick-leave-policy-good-morning-america/story?id=9013693
New Health care proposal would limit options
Polling Website
Last Minute Anti Abortion Clause
Downn then Upss
Medical Industry Grumbles, but It Stands to Gain
For any industry, there has to be at least some good news any time Congress votes to expand the market by tens of millions of customers.
Health Care Conversations
Share your thoughts about the health care debate.
Top Discussions: The Public Option| Medicare and the Elderly | A Single-Payer System
Multimedia
Related
Prescriptions: If Anything, the Senate's Task Is Trickier
Obama Presses Senate to Pass Its Health Bill (November 9, 2009)
For Abortion Foes, a Victory in Health Care Vote (November 9, 2009)
Louisiana Republican Breaks Ranks on Health Bill (November 9, 2009)
But the business world found plenty to complain about Sunday, as it assessed the House bill that would make sweeping changes in the health care system and extend insurance coverage to millions more Americans.
Insurers do not like the provision to create a new government-run insurance program. Drug makers oppose billions of dollars in rebates they would have to give to the government over 10 years. Makers of artificial hips, heart defibrillators and other medical devices are not particularly happy about the proposed 2.5 percent tax on their products.
And employers large and small oppose rules that, for many of them, would make health care coverage — long a job benefit — become a federally mandated obligation.
That is why, as attention now shifts to the Senate, where Democratic leaders are trying to merge two bills into one, virtually every business group with a stake in the outcome will be hoping to strike at least a slightly better deal than they found in the House version.
And they may indeed get a break from the Senate, where the need for Democrats to compromise to win 60 votes may ensure a more business-moderate outcome.
And yet, many analysts said on Sunday that even the House bill was not as bad for business as many in the health care industry might have feared when the overhaul effort began many months ago.
“All industries stand to gain from this legislation,” Steven D. Findlay, senior health policy analyst with Consumers Unionin Washington, said in an interview. “They’re going to continue to fight their narrow issues and get the best that they can get. But all of them are aware they stand to gain significant new business and new revenue streams as more Americans get health coverage and money flows into the system for them.”
Of course, new revenue streams apply only to companies in the business of selling medical goods and services. To employers required to provide worker health benefits or else, in many cases, pay some sort of financial penalty, the House legislation offers little to cheer about.
Employer groups complained on Sunday that the House bill would impose insurance obligations while doing little to rein in the medical costs that help drive premiums higher year after year. In fact, those groups argue, the bill’s creation of a government-run insurance program, which may pay doctors and hospitals less than private insurers do, could end up shifting even more medical costs to the private insurance system that employers use.
“This won’t just hurt business, it will hurt millions of workers who have coverage through their employers,” said John J. Castellani, president the Business Roundtable, a group of chief executives of some of the nation’s biggest companies.
And the National Federation of Independent Business, representing many small businesses, said it was furious with the legislation. Susan Eckerly, senior vice president of the federation, attacked mandates, which she called punitive, and “atrocious new taxes.” The legislation, she said, was “a failed opportunity to help small-business owners with their No. 1 problem — skyrocketing health care costs.”
Another group, the Small Business Majority, praised the legislation but said the Senate needed to take more steps to lower costs.
Employers hope the final Senate legislation ends up looking more like the bill the Finance Committee passed, which does not require companies to insure their workers.
Meanwhile, the health insurance industry has been increasingly vocal about the emerging shape of the legislation, and it was sharply critical of the bill that passed on Saturday night.
“The current House legislation fails to bend the health cost curve and breaks the promise that those who like their current coverage can keep it,” Karen M. Ignagni, the chief executive of America’s Health Insurance Plans, the industry trade association, said.
The reference to a broken promise refers, in part, to people enrolled in privately offeredMedicare Advantage insurance plans, which would lose federal subsidies under the House bill. Ms. Ignagni warned of cuts that would “force millions of seniors out of the program entirely.”
But the promise reference also refers to the bill’s provision of a new government-run insurance plan that would compete directly with the health plans offered by private insurers. The insurance industry has long opposed such a move and warns that it will eventually force many people with private insurance into the government-run program.
That “public option,” as it is known, was also in the Senate health committee bill approved in July. And the Senate majority leader, Harry Reid, Democrat of Nevada, has also signaled that he intends to include some kind of public plan in whatever Senate legislation is reached.
comment: this article is interesting because it talks about the tax and how the government wants to raise it to 2.5 percent, which would affect medicare and medicaid. it would make it so much more difficult for people and insurance companies who need or have patients who need a fake arm or leg to be able to afford it. however, they are raising the tax to help the whole nation so this could be looked at as a sacrifice if the money is put to correct use.
++ NEW YORK TIMES++: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/09/health/policy/09industry.html?ref=health
Sunday, November 8, 2009
why are health costs rising?
Free Market Survey
Health Care Reform Vote Update
News Ways of Seeing
Friday, November 6, 2009
Health Care Reform continued
Thursday, November 5, 2009
Healthcare Issues
Roses Articles
Samantha - Abortion in Health Care Reform
this is interesting because it covers abortion and how a new plan would have to involve a pro-life and pro-choice option.
Health Care Homework 11/5
1. Time Obama Speech
2. CBSMoneyWatch.com
2. New Scientist
3. MoveOn.org
Health care issues
Wednesday, November 4, 2009
5 Things you Will Lose With Health Reform
Most Americans oppose health care reforms
Tuesday, November 3, 2009
Health Care Not Covering Abuse Victims
White House Website
Health Care Reform
Health Bill Worse Than "Terrorist"
Health Care
Monday, November 2, 2009
Healthcare Videos
Some people have made reply videos trying to prove that we DON'T need a government run option. For instance, this one.
You definitely have to fact check when you look at things on youtube, but I think its really cool that there are ways like this for the population to express their opinions.
Cole on Health Care
I did go to the help desk today and got into the system. At the time I thought everything was fine but now i realize I still can't start a new topic.
I can only comment on other posts. I found this good site for health care between different states. If you could post it for me that will be great.
I will go back to the help desk tomorrow and finally get it fixed all together. The site is http://www.healthreform.gov/
Thank you.
Cole